• To: XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 23:35:44 -0700
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020611144900.02cd0058@p...>

"G. Ken Holman" wrote:
> Yes, but early thoughts are that we don't want to "break" DTDs, so we will
> look at trying to come up with conventions of use of existing DTD syntax
> before introducing new syntax and/or declarations.

Break them. Make them simple to write, understand, and use. John's
syntax is to the point of being self-evident. NOTATION never, ever will
be.

-- Ron

• References:
  • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Next by Date: Re: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
• Previous by thread: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Next by thread: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread