• To: paul@p... (Paul Prescod)
• Subject: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 06:22:12 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: gkholman@C... (G. Ken Holman), xml-dev@l... (XML-Dev Mailing list), dsdl-comment@d...
• In-reply-to: <3D06D08F.D0E0A40A@p...> from "Paul Prescod" at Jun 11, 2002 09:39:43 PM

Paul Prescod scripsit:

> There have been at least two attempts to add datatypes to DTDs without
> breaking the syntax. Lextype and DT4DTD. You're baking a cake. Please do
> not be afraid to break some eggs!

To which I would add that architectural DTDs already set a precedent
by adding some non-SGML features.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• References:
  • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by Date: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Previous by thread: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Next by thread: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread