• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
• From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>
• Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 13:56:56 -0700
• Thread-index: AcISGqQcBku1UvgvQq2ph0pjc07lUgAODRNg
• Thread-topic: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It

> http://news.com.com/2100-1001-935223.html
> 
> Do read this article.  In the realm of things the Beltway
> has tried before and failed last time for reasons that have
> absolutely nothing to to with the technology, this one

"If everyone develops their own data, schemas and definitions, we have a
Tower of Babel and we haven't gotten what we wanted."

That pretty much sums it up.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • RE: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by Date: RE: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
• Previous by thread: Re: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitab
• Next by thread: RE: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread