• To: aray@n... (Arjun Ray)
• Subject: Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:15:40 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <q6tjgu45blovc9kpg7j38i6fomtefpj5od@4...> from "Arjun Ray" at Jun 14, 2002 02:04:14 PM

Arjun Ray scripsit:

> Identifying a foo:three element as the
> "same" as an html:p element - either in a specific occurrence or for all
> occurrences of foo:three elements in various content models - is a
> straightforward matter of annotation.  Using an attribute for this has
> precedent, too.

I like AFs too, but I'm not trying to do them now.

> Insanity.

*shrug*

We are only a bunch of storyboarders here.  The real ISO committee work
is being done in closed session -- and FWIU has not yet advanced beyond
collecting use cases.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• References:
  • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
• Next by Date: Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: Re: Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
• Previous by thread: Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
• Next by thread: Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread