[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


John Cowan <jcowan@r...> wrote:
| Rick Jelliffe scripsit:
 
|> Why not just assign whole element sets to a namespace, in the external 
|> DSDL framework, and leave the syntax of DTDs exactly as it is?
| 
| I don't understand this.  How do you specify that the content model of 
| a foo:one element is a foo:two element followed by an html:p element?

Why is this a requirement?  

The content model of a foo:one element could specify a foo:two element
followed by a foo:three element.  Identifying a foo:three element as the
"same" as an html:p element - either in a specific occurrence or for all
occurrences of foo:three elements in various content models - is a
straightforward matter of annotation.  Using an attribute for this has
precedent, too.

|> What are the requirements for DTDs in DSDL?
| 
| The title of Part 9 is all we have to go on, and it talks about
| namespace-aware and datatype-aware DTDs.

Insanity.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member