• To: ricko@a... (Rick Jelliffe)
• Subject: Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 06:22:25 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: dsdl-comment@d..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <010701c21380$1a771a70$4bc8a8c0@A...> from "Rick Jelliffe" at Jun 14, 2002 06:47:23 PM

Rick Jelliffe scripsit:

> Why not just assign whole element sets to a namespace, in the external DSDL framework,
> and leave the syntax of DTDs exactly as it is?

I don't understand this.  How do you specify that the content model
of a foo:one element is a foo:two element followed by an html:p element?

> But this is discussing techniques before requirements.

A habit of mine, I fear.

> What are the requirements for DTDs in DSDL?

The title of Part 9 is all we have to go on, and it talks about
namespace-aware and datatype-aware DTDs.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• References:
  • DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
• Next by Date: Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
• Previous by thread: Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
• Next by thread: Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread