• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
• From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 17:16:07 +0000
• In-reply-to: <200206141415.KAA28282@m...>
• References: <q6tjgu45blovc9kpg7j38i6fomtefpj5od@4...> <200206141415.KAA28282@m...>

John Cowan <jcowan@r...> wrote:
| Arjun Ray scripsit:

|> [Identification] is a straightforward matter of annotation.  Using an 
|> attribute for this has precedent, too.
| 
| I like AFs too, but I'm not trying to do them now.

Neither am I.  I'm just having trouble understanding the resistance to the
idea of attributes for annotations.  Is there some "ontological" view (of
"what attributes are for") getting in the way?

We don't have to do AFs.  That's no reason not to adopt the *ideas*.

• References:
  • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
  • Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Tommorrow, June 15th, Deadline for Call for Presentation for XML
• Next by Date: RE: Validate with schemas
• Previous by thread: Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
• Next by thread: Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread