• To: <michael.h.kay@n...>,"'Jeni Tennison'" <jeni@j...>
• Subject: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 05:53:24 -0700
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <001501c1f7ab$d602f1b0$6501a8c0@pcukmka>
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020509133355.03d1e858@n...>

At 11:49 PM 5/9/2002 +0100, Michael Kay wrote:
>The feedback from this list is brilliant. It reminds us that the concepts we
>have become familiar with through months of discussion may seem obscure and
>irrelevant to those meeting them for the first time. It forces us to ask
>which of these things are really necessary. The feedback would be even
>better if some of it found its way to public-qt-comments@w..., where a lot
>more members of the WGs would see it.

I absolutely agree with both points here. This is great feedback - I want 
to see more of it on the public comments list.

Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• References:
  • XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: PSVI formalization
• Next by Date: Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Previous by thread: Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Next by thread: Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread