• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: PSVI formalization
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 08:53:28 -0400
• References: <000601c1f805$cb531830$887ba8c0@mitchum>

[Bill de hÓra]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alaric Snell [mailto:alaric@a...]
>
> I usually find that multimedia is a good example - audio and
> video and images
> are not good candidates for XML storage, and they (certainly
> images at least)
> account for a LOT of the information being exchanged over the
> Web today!

True (see SOAP+attachmemts). XML is a good candidate for sending
metadata about binary data.

As in MPEG-7, if I understand things right.

Cheers,

Tom P

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: PSVI formalization
    • From: Claude Seyrat <claude.seyrat@e...>
  • Re: PSVI formalization
    • From: Alaric Snell <alaric@a...>

• References:
  • RE: PSVI formalization
    • From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: PSVI formalization
• Next by Date: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Previous by thread: RE: PSVI formalization
• Next by thread: Re: PSVI formalization
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread