• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: PSVI formalization
• From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>
• Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 10:33:49 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <E1765nZ-0005IE-00@c...>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alaric Snell [mailto:alaric@a...] 
>
> I usually find that multimedia is a good example - audio and 
> video and images 
> are not good candidates for XML storage, and they (certainly 
> images at least) 
> account for a LOT of the information being exchanged over the 
> Web today!

True (see SOAP+attachmemts). XML is a good candidate for sending
metadata about binary data.

Bill de hÓra

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: PSVI formalization
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• References:
  • Re: PSVI formalization
    • From: Alaric Snell <alaric@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• Next by Date: Re: PSVI formalization
• Previous by thread: Re: PSVI formalization
• Next by thread: Re: PSVI formalization
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread