• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 16:00:25 -0700
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020509133355.03d1e858@n...> <5.1.0.14.0.20020510055257.018368d8@n...>

Jonathan Robie wrote:

> I absolutely agree with both points here. This is great feedback - I want
> to see more of it on the public comments list.

I would be surprised if that happens. I haven't participated on many W3C
lists, but the few I have been on have too long a lag time to generate
significant discussion. You can play chess by mail, but most people
prefer to play in person.

-- Ron

• References:
  • XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: OT: XPath Explorer - was RE: XPath 2.0 - howmuch of XQuery should it include?
• Next by Date: Re: PSVI formalization
• Previous by thread: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Next by thread: Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread