• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: OT: XPath Explorer - was RE: XPath 2.0 - howmuch of XQuery should it include?
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 18:29:18 -0400
• References: <002301c1f843$a06d4ee0$887ba8c0@mitchum>

[Bill de hÓra]

>Tom Passin:
> I'll tell you want a lot of users want.  They want an XPath
> that they have a fighting chance of writing correct
> expressions for.

XPath Explorer: <http://www.purpletech.com/xpe/index.jsp>; is fun to
play around with and probably a good learning tool (it was pointed out
to me on the XP list, when the subject of unit testing XML output with
XPaths came up).

{Tom P]

Yes, I've looked at it and a few others.  Pretty nice, though I don't find I
use them often in practice - I'm not sure why.

Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • OT: XPath Explorer - was RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
    • From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: PSVI formalization
• Next by Date: Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Previous by thread: OT: XPath Explorer - was RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Next by thread: Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread