• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: OT: XPath Explorer - was RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>
• Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 17:56:26 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <007e01c1f7bd$7079e1c0$0bf13044@tbp>

Hi Tom,

>Tom Passin:
> I'll tell you want a lot of users want.  They want an XPath 
> that they have a fighting chance of writing correct 
> expressions for.  

XPath Explorer: <http://www.purpletech.com/xpe/index.jsp>; is fun to
play around with and probably a good learning tool (it was pointed out
to me on the XP list, when the subject of unit testing XML output with
XPaths came up).  

Bill de hÓra

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: OT: XPath Explorer - was RE: XPath 2.0 - howmuch of XQuery should it include?
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• References:
  • Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Next by Date: RE: The vision for XPath 2.0
• Previous by thread: Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Next by thread: Re: OT: XPath Explorer - was RE: XPath 2.0 - howmuch of XQuery should it include?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread