• To: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>,"Arjun Ray" <aray@n...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 06:47:45 -0700
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621BE4@r...>

At 02:10 AM 5/11/2002 -0700, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
>*cough* bs *cough*
>
>XPath doesn't satisfy DBMS vendors and neither does its big brother 
>XQuery. Bzzzt, try again.

Hmmm....now that Microsoft, IBM, and Oracle have all released prototypes or 
announced support for XQuery in their databases, one might think that at 
least some major DBMS vendors think there may be a reason for it.

Jonathan

• References:
  • RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
• Next by Date: Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
• Previous by thread: Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Next by thread: Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread