• To: "Steve Muench" <Steve.Muench@o...>,<AndrewWatt2000@a...>
• Subject: Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 06:49:08 -0700
• Cc: "Xml-Dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <001d01c1f9fc$52508cd0$671e2382@smuenchlap>
• References: <121.10c9a2c2.2a0ff5aa@a...>

At 11:29 PM 5/12/2002 +0200, Steve Muench wrote:
>We definitely did favor the idea of not having
>two completely parallel syntaxes to accomplish
>nearly the same types of queries, so we were in
>support of unifying the XPath and XQuery missions
>so users using the two syntaxes together would
>not have to learn two.

Amen.

>What will be the popular
>subset of the common syntax that most users find
>"just enough to be what they need" is still to
>be determined.

Amen.

Jonathan

• References:
  • Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
  • Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
    • From: "Steve Muench" <Steve.Muench@o...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Next by Date: Re: typing and markup (was Re: XQuery types)
• Previous by thread: Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
• Next by thread: Re: RE: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread