• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 10:17:48 +0000
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621BE4@r...>
• References: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621BE4@r...>

 "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...> wrote:

| XPath doesn't satisfy DBMS vendors and neither does its big brother XQuery. 

Thank the &Deity; for small mercies!

| Bzzzt, try again. 

Okay, a children's tale this time:

 http://www.indianest.com/natkhat/025.htm

• References:
  • RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Next by Date: Re: Stopping the SAX parser
• Previous by thread: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Next by thread: RE: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread