• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 15:34:15 -0800
• In-reply-to: <200204032233.XAA10937@s...>
• References: <20020403183305.GA16884@p...>

At 11:33 PM 03/04/02 +0100, Richard Tobin wrote:
>>Is there a good argument why Namespaces-1.1 *shouldn't* be rolled
>>into the XML-1.1 req/draft?
>
>A true unification of the XML and Namespaces spec would only make
>sense if various other things were done, in particular dealing with
>the special-case "pseudo-namespaced" attributes xml:lang and
>xml:space.  This would be a good thing, but we decided not to add that
>to our task-list right now.

It could be done: see http://www.textuality.com/xml/xmlSW.html

 -Tim

• References:
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: Adam Turoff <ziggy@p...>
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Next by Date: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Previous by thread: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread