[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]



Adam Turoff wrote:

> If Namespaces were to be rolled into the core specification, there
> is nothing preventing a vendor from creating a parser that does
> XML without namespace support; they should just call it something
> else

Umm, no thanks. There are still plenty of people working with DTDs and/or
avoiding the use of namespaces where possible. I don't think that it's
appropriate to condemn them to using a non-XML parser, or am I missing something?

> (like XML-lite or something, which is what XML is without
> namespaces).

Heh heh...


--
Regards,

Marcus Carr                      email:  mcarr@a...
___________________________________________________________________
Allette Systems (Australia)      www:    http://www.allette.com.au
___________________________________________________________________
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."
       - Einstein



Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member