• To: "John Cowan" <jcowan@r...>,"Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@m...>
• Subject: Re: undeclared attribute types
• From: "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@e...>
• Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 14:28:19 +0100
• Cc: <sax-devel@l...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• References: <200204191219.IAA05589@m...>

John Cowan wrote:

> > (The restriction to non-validating processors here is IMO an erratum in
> > the spec which I just reported to the editors.)
>
> Validating processors treat undeclared attributes as validity errors.

True, but that doesn't stop the attributes from still requiring
normalization and being reported to the application.  I agree with Elliotte,
these seems to be an oversight in the recommendation.

~Rob

• References:
  • Re: undeclared attribute types
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Schema / XML document parsing
• Next by Date: Re: WebDAV / RFC 3253 ???
• Previous by thread: Re: undeclared attribute types
• Next by thread: OT: (RE: Patents)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread