• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: REST has too many verbs
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 18:05:50 -0500
• In-reply-to: <3C699737.379CA284@p...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <NCBBKFMJCLIMOBIGKFMJGEPHHCAA.ldodds@i...> <E16alCi-0008Hl-00@s...> <3C699737.379CA284@p...>

On Tuesday 12 February 2002 05:29 pm, Paul Prescod wrote:
> > My point was not that this is a bad thing to do, simply that REST
> > does not require GET...
>
> You do need GET. GET is the whole point. Think "web of information"
> instead of "collection of components."

Are you talking about REST or your interpretation of it? 

A  get() could be modelled by 2 put()...

• References:
  • RE: REST has too many verbs
    • From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@i...>
  • Re: REST has too many verbs
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
  • Re: REST has too many verbs
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Xerces error report "attribute 'foo' should be qualified"
• Next by Date: Re: "Abstract" URIs
• Previous by thread: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Next by thread: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread