• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: "Abstract" URIs
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 12 Feb 2002 19:33:40 -0500
• In-reply-to: <3C69A32B.6D1AA8C9@p...>
• References: <E16al5H-0004sH-00@m...> <3C69A32B.6D1AA8C9@p...>

On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 18:20, Paul Prescod wrote:
> I would say that you are probably:
> 
>  http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/
> 
> and your home page is probably:
> 
>  http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/index.html
> 
> But if you do a GET on each of them you happen to get an identical
> resource. Alternately you could simply choose not to reify your homepage
> at all.

"I am a human being.  Please do not spindle, fold, staple, mutilate, or
reify me."

I just don't know why I see this whole URI thing as limited.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• References:
  • Re: Re: Why REST? (RE: WSIO- With Name)
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
  • "Abstract" URIs
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Next by Date: [Fwd: Re: Schematron/Schema market share]
• Previous by thread: "Abstract" URIs
• Next by thread: Re: "Abstract" URIs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread