• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: REST has too many verbs
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 16:20:40 -0500
• In-reply-to: <200202120147.UAA11421@m...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <200202120147.UAA11421@m...>

On Monday 11 February 2002 08:47 pm, Mark Baker wrote:
> > > getFile(), getName(), getArticle(), getStockQuote() were what we
> > > had *before* the Web.  I can't see any reason to go back after
> > > seeing what can be achieved with GET.
> >
> > What does that have to do with REST then?
>
> Hmm, I must be missing something.

My point was that REST doesn't necessarily require GET... particularly 
as capaitalized here that to me, implies HTTP. REST != HTTP, HTTP ~= 
REST

• References:
  • Re: REST has too many verbs
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Why REST? (RE: WSIO- With Name)
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Why REST? (RE: WSIO- With Name)
• Previous by thread: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Next by thread: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread