• To: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: Re: Worse XML tools?
• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 23:54:03 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEE8FD@HQ5> <3C76C709.70404@r...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020214

John Cowan wrote:

> It does not.  It does sell keywords, so "worst xml tools"
> will get the same "Sponsored Links" (clearly so marked)
> as "best xml tools", based on the presence of "xml tools".

That's not totally accurate. I had tried several phrases before posting 
this and for some combinations, Tamino happens to be replaced by IONA :)

Eric
-- 
See you in Seattle.
                                        http://knowledgetechnologies.net/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org      http://4xt.org           http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• References:
  • RE: Worse XML tools?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: Worse XML tools?
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML & government in general
• Next by Date: RE: Worse XML tools?
• Previous by thread: Re: Worse XML tools?
• Next by thread: RE: Worse XML tools?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread