• To: 'John Cowan' <jcowan@r...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Worse XML tools?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:40:56 -0600

Same difference: a portal of opinions, sponsored and unsponsored, 
filtering a search with the sponsored opinions up top and labeled.

"The Web" is a useful but ugly golem.  At least it dresses like one.

len

From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@r...]


Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

> Yes.  Google probably uses most visited and most 
> linked to.

Most linked to and most linked from.

>  It may also sell positions. 


It does not.  It does sell keywords, so "worst xml tools"
will get the same "Sponsored Links" (clearly so marked)
as "best xml tools", based on the presence of "xml tools".

• Prev by Date: Re: Worse XML tools?
• Next by Date: RE: Worse XML tools?
• Previous by thread: Re: Worse XML tools?
• Next by thread: RE: Worse XML tools?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread