• To: 'Handoko' <st018509@a...>
• Subject: RE: Worse XML tools?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 08:06:52 -0600
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

Yes.  Google probably uses most visited and most 
linked to.  It may also sell positions.  That exchange 
is satirical, not technical.

The best way to determine the quality of a 
tool is to use it in accordance with your requirements. 
Typically, I get best results by combining several 
tools and comparing.  When building XML Schemas, 
I found Spy to be good for large schemas, for the ODBC 
interface, and access to the datatypes.  I found I also 
needed tools like Topologi for quick and accurate 
validation of the XML Schema.  I don't particularly 
like grid editing interfaces but I don't have an 
alternative.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Handoko [mailto:st018509@a...]

search: good+xml+tools also gave the same result.
So, that results just point something about xml tool.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Worse XML tools?
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Simplified XPointer
• Next by Date: RE: Data-oriented XML [was: Scatter/gather pattern]
• Previous by thread: RE: Worse XML tools?
• Next by thread: Re: Worse XML tools?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread