• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Namespace Usage Question
• From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:34:57 GMT
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <20011219004030.A22221@d...>
• Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

>I did some searching for publicly known namespaces
>(schema in particular) which use the flexibility of
>URI references by either being non-absolute or having
>a fragment.

You should note that relative namespace URIs are illegal (surely this
debate cannot have been forgotten?).  See http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xppa
for details.

-- Richard

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Namespace Usage Question
    • From: "Clark C . Evans" <cce@c...>

• References:
  • Namespace Usage Question
    • From: "Clark C . Evans" <cce@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1
• Next by Date: Re: Namespace Usage Question
• Previous by thread: Namespace Usage Question
• Next by thread: Re: Namespace Usage Question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread