• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Namespace Usage Question
• From: "Clark C . Evans" <cce@c...>
• Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 00:40:30 -0500
• User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

I did some searching for publicly known namespaces 
(schema in particular) which use the flexibility of 
URI references by either being non-absolute or having 
a fragment.  In other words, one of the following cases: 

A.  xmlns:foo="relative"
B.  xmlns:foo="http://somehost/somepath#fragment"
C.  xmlns:foo="relative#fragment"

I've seen a few of class A in examples, but I haven't found 
a schema using A.  As for B and C, I'm still looking for a 
schema that uses fragments as part of its URI reference.   
Perhaps I'm not looking hard enough....

Any pointers would be helpful.  I'm not interested in
a debate on the merits, just interested in those who
may have used this XML namespace feature in the "real world"
and perhaps a description of why.  I will summarize 
private responses with this header in a few days time.

Kind Regards,

Clark



























-- 
Clark C. Evans                   Axista, Inc.
http://www.axista.com            800.926.5525
XCOLLA Collaborative Project Management Software

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Namespace Usage Question
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
• Next by Date: Re: Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1
• Previous by thread: WebSphere tool development trial version - heavy on XML
• Next by thread: Re: Namespace Usage Question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread