• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1
• From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:26:40 GMT
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <E16GeGR-0004mt-00@m...>
• Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

In article <E16GeGR-0004mt-00@m...> you write:
>That was my original position: map NEL away, but don't change the
>definition of the S (whitespace) production.  Richard Tobin convinced
>me that that position was inconsistent: embarrassingly, I can't
>remember quite why.

The situation is the same as for CR.

If you map NEL to LF on input, it can only appear (in parsed data) as
a result of character references in internal paramater entities.  Adding
it to S will make these parse consistently with normal input.

-- Richard

• References:
  • Re: Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1
• Next by Date: Re: Namespace Usage Question
• Previous by thread: Re: Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: XML-1.1 -- just ignore it
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread