• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1
• From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:20:21 GMT
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <p04330100b84390db8f06@[192.168.254.4]>
• Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

In article <p04330100b84390db8f06@[192.168.254.4]> you write:
>No, Emacs most certainly does accept all three line ending 
>conventions.

This depends on the version of Emacs.  Probably the newest ones do.
But Emacs could certainly be easily changed to accept NEL too, if
anyone cared.  If people started receiving XML files with NEL in them,
it probably would be changed.

-- Richard

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• References:
  • Re: Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
• Next by Date: Re: Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1
• Previous by thread: Re: Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread