• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@h...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 08:56:01 -0600

That means the markup is right, the smart ASCII. 
You forgot GenCoding.  XML was the fourth try 
so the bracketed bits work.
 
SGML didn't do semantics or the data model. 
Groves took a shot, so InfoSet is the second try.
We are on the second query try (HyQ/XPath) and 
the third stylesheet (FOSI/DSSSL/XSLT), so if that 
model is the working one... you do the math.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas B. Passin [mailto:tpassin@h...]

 If you subscribe to the notion that you have to do something all over again
three times to really get it  right, are we on the 3rd attempt now?  (I'm
thinking GML, SGM, XML)

• Prev by Date: RE: is that a fork in the road?
• Next by Date: RE: XP and fruit-picking (was Re: is that a fork in the road?)
• Previous by thread: RE: is that a fork in the road?
• Next by thread: RE: is that a fork in the road?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread