• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: David Megginson <david@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 09:02:09 -0600

That depends on a very smart endgame focused customer 
and a contract that does not include maintenance or 
enhancements.  Good for some kinds of service-based 
work but will not scale to large sales of standardized 
or functionally stable software.

You guys learned absolutely nothing from the 
Netscape debacle.  Microsoft didn't have to 
beat them; they only had to wait for the fruit 
to rot on the vine and fall off.

Think Ford, not Ferrari.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: David Megginson [mailto:david@m...]

On the contrary, the XP people grasp at the low-hanging fruit
precisely because they do not trust their knowledge of the endgame
requirements.  They know that the requirements *will* change during
development, drastically and continuously, so they implement the bare
minimum necessary to meet their short-term goals (i.e. two- to
three-weeks) and give the customer a chance to have some hands-on
experience and (possibly) rewrite the requirements after each
iteration.  Wild stuff.

• Prev by Date: RE: is that a fork in the road?
• Next by Date: [ANN] DeltaXML: XML file comparisons and change control
• Previous by thread: Simon and Simon (Simon St. Laurent and Herbert Simon)
• Next by thread: RE: XP and fruit-picking (was Re: is that a fork in the road?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread