[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>, Marcus Carr <mrc@a...>,xml-dev@l...
  • Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 08:51:28 -0600

As long as one doesn't have to deliver contractually 
specified features (what most winning businesses do), that 
works fine.   When one doesn't win, the VC capital runs out. 
 
The API of poverty is simple in the extreme.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...]

At 10:57 AM 05/03/01 +1100, Marcus Carr wrote:
>Although picking the low
>hanging fruit provided a good platform to market from, you would hardly use
it
>as a model for software development (or many other things that spring to
mind).

In fact (in particular from the Extreme Programming point of view), you
should arguably *always* use it as a model for software development.
And incrementalism applies well as an approach to lots of other
activities, too. -Tim

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member