• From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>
• To: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 15:26:42 +0100

> XML 1.0, Second Edition, will incorporate the published errata into
> the text of the XML Recommendation.  It is not XML 1.1.  It is not
> considered a substantial change in XML.

Can it be assumed then that the list of possible changes for XML "2nd 
Edition" is separate to any likely outcome of the discussion playing 
out on xml-uri?

In other words whats the relationship between the two, if any?

L.

-- 
Leigh Dodds, Systems Architect       | "Pluralitas non est ponenda
http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic |    sine necessitates"
http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant    |     -- William of Ockham

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• References:
  • Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Next by Date: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Previous by thread: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Next by thread: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread