• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: ldodds@i...
• Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 13:22:49 -0400

Leigh Dodds wrote:

> Can it be assumed then that the list of possible changes for XML "2nd
> Edition" is separate to any likely outcome of the discussion playing
> out on xml-uri?
> 
> In other words whats the relationship between the two, if any?

None.  Namespaces is not an XML 1.0 concept.  OTOH, the same W3C WG
is responsible for both documents.

-- 

Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • RE: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
    • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Irony heaped on irony
• Next by Date: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Previous by thread: RE: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Next by thread: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread