• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: pandeng@t...
• Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 10:37:45 -0400

Steve Schafer wrote:

> If I read that sentence literally, it seems to me that it says that
> this is legal
> 
>  <element>foo bar ]]> bar foo</element>
> 
> since "foo bar ]]> bar foo" most definitely constitutes "any string of
> characters which [sic] does not contain the start-delimiter of any
> markup."
> 
> But that particular content string is forbidden both by the previous
> sentence and by the CharData production [14].

Ah.  Perhaps we should insert "legal" before "string of characters".

-- 

Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
    • From: Bob Kline <bkline@r...>
  • Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
    • From: Steve Schafer <pandeng@t...>

• References:
  • Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
    • From: Steve Schafer <pandeng@t...>
  • Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
  • Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
    • From: Steve Schafer <pandeng@t...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Next by Date: RE: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Previous by thread: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Next by thread: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread