Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Steve Schafer scripsit: > Speaking of which, I don't know if there is an existing erratum or > not, but I find the language of section 2.4 to be ambiguous and > confusing. In particular, these two sentences seem to be in direct > contradiction: > > "The right angle bracket (>) may be represented using the string > '>', and must, for compatibility, be escaped using '>' or a > character reference when it appears in the string ']]>' in content..." > > "In the content of elements, character data is any string of > characters which does not contain the start-delimiter of any markup." No real conflict, I think. It's true that a CDATA section is always in the content of some element, but the second sentence refers to the *immediate* character-data content of elements. -- John Cowan cowan@c... Yes, I know the message date is bogus. I can't help it. --me, on far too many occasions *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
