Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Susan Lesch scripsit: > > John Cowan wrote: > > >This goes well beyond the goals of XML 1.0 2nd ed, which is not meant to > >change radical things like your #3. It is simply a republication with > >the errata incorporated of XML 1.0. > > So far, W3C technical publications [1] come in version numbers, part > numbers, and Levels, but not in "editions." May I suggest that what > you call the 2d edition follow the naming convention in XML 1.0, and > be titled "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1" or "1.0.1," whatever > number suits the editors? A change to the XML version number would make existing 1.0 XML parsers unable to cope. Since we are not making incompatible changes, a new version would be inappropriate. John Cowan cowan@c... Yes, I know the message date is bogus. I can't help it. --me, on far too many occasions *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
