• From: Susan Lesch <lesch@w...>
• To: xml-editor@w..., xml-dev@x...
• Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 18:25:01 -0800

John Cowan wrote:

>This goes well beyond the goals of XML 1.0 2nd ed, which is not meant to
>change radical things like your #3.  It is simply a republication with
>the errata incorporated of XML 1.0.

So far, W3C technical publications [1] come in version numbers, part 
numbers, and Levels, but not in "editions." May I suggest that what 
you call the 2d edition follow the naming convention in XML 1.0, and 
be titled "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1" or "1.0.1," whatever 
number suits the editors?

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/
-- 
Susan Lesch
Intern, W3C


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• References:
  • Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
    • From: Rick JELLIFFE <ricko@g...>
  • Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Next by Date: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Previous by thread: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Next by thread: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread