• From: Toby Speight <Toby.Speight@s...>
• To: "XML developers' list" <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: 07 Mar 2000 15:37:25 +0000

Philip> Philip Nye <URL:mailto:philipnye@f...>

0> In article <38C38BB9.E5BFAFC3@f...>, Philip wrote:

Philip> I cannot quite follow your axioms here. Taking bare XML syntax
Philip> without reference to any particular schema language, I would
Philip> rephrase the table thus.
Philip>
Philip>               Elements            Attributes
Philip> Ordered?      schema dependent    schema dependent
Philip> Uniqueness?   schema dependent    schema dependent
Philip> structured?   schema dependent    No
Philip>
Philip> Am I wrong? Is there anything in the syntax apart from DTDs
Philip> which forces unique unordered attributes?

"WFC: Unique Att Spec" on production 40 forces uniqueness.  There's
no such constraint on orderedness, though you may be unable to use
standard parsers if you want to preserve order.

-- 


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Structured attributes
    • From: Philip Nye <philipnye@f...>

• References:
  • Structured attributes
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
  • Re: Structured attributes
    • From: Philip Nye <philipnye@f...>

• Prev by Date: Fw: The Easy, Academic life
• Next by Date: Re: The RDF model *is* part of the problem
• Previous by thread: Re: Structured attributes
• Next by thread: Re: Structured attributes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread