Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
"Henry S. Thompson" wrote:
>
> ...we all know the comparison between elements and attributes as
> they stand:
>
> Elements Attributes
> ordered unordered
> non-unique unique
> structured unstructured
>
> There are a lot of contexts in which the first two properties of
> attributes are desireable, but the third is a serious constraint.
Henry,
I cannot quite follow your axioms here. Taking bare XML syntax without
reference to any particular schema language, I would rephrase the table
thus.
Elements Attributes
Ordered? schema dependent schema dependent
Uniqueness? schema dependent schema dependent
structured? schema dependent No
Am I wrong? Is there anything in the syntax apart from DTDs which forces
unique unordered attributes? Is there any reason why elements must be
ordered? (apart from problems with arbitrarily complex content models
and the & operator - problems which might rear their heads anyway if
attributes bacame structured).
Your proposal for adding structure to attributes, turns attributes into
elements anyway (at the syntax level) so why bother with attributes at
all?
Philip
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
