• From: Stefan Haustein <haustein@k...>
• To: jlowery@s..., XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 12:26:05 +0100

Jeff Lowery wrote:
> 
> But what's done it done. Hmmm... I wonder if the SML-dev group is working on
> a schema?

It would be nice if SML-Schema could just be defined as a subset of XML
schema,
similar to SML beeing a simple subset of XML. But with the current specs
that 
seems difficult: Neither <element> nor <type> is useful on its own.

Best regards

Stefan

-- 
Stefan Haustein
University of Dortmund
Computer Science VIII
www-ai.cs.uni-dortmund.de

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XML Schema WG changing gears (was Re: Schema concepts)
    • From: "Jeff Lowery" <jlowery@s...>

• References:
  • RE: XML Schema WG changing gears (was Re: Schema concepts)
    • From: "Jeff Lowery" <jlowery@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: good book on XML
• Next by Date: Re: Schema concepts
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Schema WG changing gears (was Re: Schema concepts)
• Next by thread: RE: XML Schema WG changing gears (was Re: Schema concepts)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread