• From: "Jeff Lowery" <jlowery@s...>
• To: <haustein@k...>, "XML-Dev Mailing list" <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 11:08:20 -0800

You have a point, but maybe there's some syntactical trick that can be used
by the SML group.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: haustein@k...
> [mailto:haustein@k...]On Behalf Of Stefan Haustein
> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2000 3:26 AM
> To: jlowery@s...; XML-Dev Mailing list
> Subject: Re: XML Schema WG changing gears (was Re: Schema concepts)
>
>
> Jeff Lowery wrote:
> >
> > But what's done it done. Hmmm... I wonder if the SML-dev group
> is working on
> > a schema?
>
> It would be nice if SML-Schema could just be defined as a subset of XML
> schema,
> similar to SML beeing a simple subset of XML. But with the current specs
> that
> seems difficult: Neither <element> nor <type> is useful on its own.
>
> Best regards
>
> Stefan
>
> --
> Stefan Haustein
> University of Dortmund
> Computer Science VIII
> www-ai.cs.uni-dortmund.de
>


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • Re: XML Schema WG changing gears (was Re: Schema concepts)
    • From: Stefan Haustein <haustein@k...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Next by Date: Does not work -- Re: FW: How To Include external XSL files into a master XSL file
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Schema WG changing gears (was Re: Schema concepts)
• Next by thread: RE: Schema concepts
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread