• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 16:46:08 -0500 (EST)

David Brownell writes:

 > Naturally I don't have too much objection to this, though I'd like
 > to see the standard factory naming convention (createX, not makeX).

Done (in beta2).

 > However, I do wonder what you think about the fact that this will
 > need to run in environments where calls like System.getProperty()
 > aren't allowed, or which may not support dynamic loading.

I put a warning in the JavaDoc.  It's amazing how many bugs that can
fix.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • RE: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
    • From: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>
  • Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: XLink - Assert linking relationships among more than two resources
• Next by Date: "SAX2 Namespace Support" Configuration Example
• Previous by thread: Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Next by thread: Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread