• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: Michael Fuller <msf@i...>
• Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 17:16:26 -0500 (EST)

Michael Fuller writes:

 > Question: in both cases, should the raw name of the xmlns attribute be
 > "xmlns:h", not "xmlns"? Particularly in the false/true case, this seems the
 > only way to be able to faithfully recreate the original XML 1.0 document...

Right -- thanks for catching the typo.

 > Aside: I note that the JavaDoc of the Attributes interface refers to 
 > the "raw-names" feature and "http://xml.org/sax/features/raw-names",
 > not namespace-prefixes.

I fixed that in time for beta2.

 > Aside 2: The _SAX2: Features and Properties_ document doesn't specify 
 > the defaults for the listed core features; however, other documents,
 > such as _Namespace Support_ and the JavaDoc do talk about default values.
 > Perhaps an extra line should be added to the description of each feature
 > stating its default value?

Good suggestion.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: "SAX2 Namespace Support" Configuration Example
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • "SAX2 Namespace Support" Configuration Example
    • From: Michael Fuller <msf@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Next by Date: Re: A certain difficulty
• Previous by thread: "SAX2 Namespace Support" Configuration Example
• Next by thread: Re: "SAX2 Namespace Support" Configuration Example
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread