Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
David Brownell wrote, > So, have a look at my pipeline package. It layers code to > control some of those basic features, including validation. > You'll start to see why I don't think putting it into the > core of SAX is necessary. Interesting, but, I think, orthogonal to the factory part of my proposals. As a means of constucting chains of SAX event processors it's quite nice (tho' I have a bit of a horror of String based specifications), but it doesn't help to resolve the bootstrap issue. At some point or another you'll still have to programmatically reference some vendors parser. That means either hard-wiring a reference to that parser into mainline code, or coming up with an ad hoc factory solution. Better to put that in the SAX core, I'd say. Cheers, Miles -- Miles Sabin Cromwell Media Internet Systems Architect 5/6 Glenthorne Mews +44 (0)20 8817 4030 London, W6 0LJ, England msabin@c... http://www.cromwellmedia.com/ *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html ***************************************************************************
|
