[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> > And the namespace-oblivious world is just no longer interesting. > > > > -Tim > > Interesting or not, and that depends on point of view :-), I'm not convinced > that the namespace-oblivious world is going to go away. Ever. If one wants > to use XML only in the context of one's own application, namespaces aren't > useful or needed. One of the reasons XML is so great is that you don't > *need* a DTD to process XML documents - are we just going to replace the DTD > with namespaces, and require that all XML documents use namespaces of some > sort? Is it not sufficient for the namespace-oblivious world to simply use SAX 1.0? -- Uche Ogbuji FourThought LLC, IT Consultants uche.ogbuji@f... (970)481-0805 Software engineering, project management, Intranets and Extranets http://FourThought.com http://OpenTechnology.org xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|

Cart



