• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: uche.ogbuji@f...
• Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 13:08:43 -0800

uche.ogbuji@f... wrote:
> 
> Is it not sufficient for the namespace-oblivious world to simply use SAX 1.0?

Nope.  SAX 1.0 is missing more features than namespaces, and
one of the most bothersome notions in the latest round of SAX2
discussions is that it give up SAX 1.0 compatibility.

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: SAX2: Namespace Processing and NSUtils helper class
    • From: uche.ogbuji@f...

• Prev by Date: Re: Xpath and DOM
• Next by Date: Re: Xpath and DOM
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX2: Namespace Processing and NSUtils helper class
• Next by thread: RE: SAX2: Namespace Processing and NSUtils helper class
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread