• From: Marcus Carr <mrc@a...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 08:48:04 +1100

Don Park wrote:

> Net result is that SML data will be well-formed but invalid
> name error will not be reported.

Well formed as long as the document (or whatever they're now called) doesn't look like:

   This is a <size>big</size> waste of energy<period/>

Or have I misread the EBNF? The above is both legal and desirable, right?


--
Regards,

Marcus Carr                      email:  mrc@a...
___________________________________________________________________
Allette Systems (Australia)      www:    http://www.allette.com.au
___________________________________________________________________
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."
       - Einstein



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: A call for reason
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?
• Next by Date: Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?
• Previous by thread: Re: A call for reason
• Next by thread: Re: A call for reason
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread