• From: "Clark C. Evans" <clark.evans@m...>
• To: "Joshua E. Smith" <jesmith@k...>
• Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 04:20:58 -0500 (EST)

On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Joshua E. Smith wrote:
> Sure, you can normalize this to:
>
> <Thing>
>  <Id>foo</Id>
> </Thing>
> 
> But, well.... yuck.  This is just... strange.
> 
> Doesn't it strike you as perverse to dive into the sub-elements of an
> element to get a handle to the parent?

Yes it does.  It also requires that the _entire_ element be read
in (till its end tag is encountered) just in the case that a child
provides details which modify the parent -- in this case, the
parent's identifier.


;) Clark




xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?
    • From: Pavel Velikhov <pvelikho@c...>

• References:
  • Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?
    • From: "Joshua E. Smith" <jesmith@k...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?
• Next by Date: Re: A call for reason
• Previous by thread: Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?
• Next by thread: Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread