• From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 22:08:58 +1100

At 16:03 29/11/1999 , Joe Lapp wrote:

>I'm learning through the grapevine that some people of influence are 
>opposed to the SML effort.

And there's some others of us who are
_obviously_ opposed to SML.

Who needs a grapevine?

(Gee, this is all wasting a lot of
bandwidth.)

J


-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution

http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@s...

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • A call for reason
    • From: Joe Lapp <jlapp@w...>

• Prev by Date: RE: [SML] RE: Forget SML. We need RTSML.
• Next by Date: RE: A call for reason
• Previous by thread: Re: A call for reason
• Next by thread: RE: A call for reason
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread